Not in the print version but will be in the online version:
National resources or benefits cannot be divvied up or denied to anyone because of who they voted for or did not vote for.
Yes, that is easier said than done, but it cannot be a policy that it is done the other way to the detriment of millions whose sin is voting for their preferred candidate, a right guaranteed in our constitution.
Wise counsel which Ruto seems to be heeding is to aggressively reach out to those areas where he is not popular and make inroads there with the wind of incumbency behind him.
This, of course, must go hand and glove with reducing the cost of living for everyone and getting the country going in the right direction both economically and politically.
Doing so, namely, reaching out and making sure everyone is served by the government notwithstanding how they voted will likely cost him support in other areas such as those where people feel entitled but in the long run, this will be better for Ruto, and better for the country.
That is the moral and constitutional obligation Ruto has and must deliver.